贾森·富曼(Jason Furman)在《纽约时报》发表的文章“哈里斯是更安全的经济选择”(Sep. 17日刊出)，展示了最初导致美国民粹浪潮的经济学思考。当我们的领导人与受国家资助的中国公司进行所谓的自由贸易时，240万名美国人失去了工作机会。同时，多家中国企业窃取了数万亿美元的美国知识产权。决策者在认识现实方面滞后超过十年之久，但他们现在对遏制北京反市场的攻势的努力被公认为理所当然。
富曼回顾了一个不同的时期。他认为拜登政府“错误地保留并增加了特朗普对中国加征的关税”，同时歌颂副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯似乎对强硬贸易政策不甚热衷的态度。富曼是否想要我们忽略过去的25年历史？
新闻来源：www.wsj.com
原文地址：Sen. Rubio Responds on U.S. Trade Policy With China
新闻日期：2024-09-25
原文摘要：
Jason Furman’s argument that “Harris Is the Safer Economic Choice” (op-ed, Sept. 17) showcases the economic thinking that prompted America’s populist wave in the first place. When our leaders established so-called free trade with state-subsidized Chinese companies, 2.4 million Americans lost their jobs. Various Chinese entities went further and stole trillions of dollars in American intellectual property. It took policy makers over a decade to catch up with reality, but their efforts to stem Beijing’s anti-market onslaught are now accepted as common sense. Mr. Furman hearkens to a different era. He asserts that the Biden administration “was wrong to keep and add to the tariffs Mr. Trump placed on China” and celebrates how Vice President Kamala Harris “doesn’t seem enthusiastic” about tough trade policies. Does Mr. Furman mean for us to ignore the past 25 years?
